5 ms·
Fair point, but it's not a restaurant and educating readers this etiquette would be really tough. How about pay for reading and refund if you think it's not wor
by eistrati 10y ago
Fair point, but it's not a restaurant and educating readers this etiquette would be really tough. How about pay for reading and refund if you think it's not worth your money? Would you do that?
- loeg 10y agoThat seems reasonable.
- sliverstorm 10y agoA simple method for that could be if the user closes the tab or navigates away before a fixed time period passes, such that it's clear they didn't have time to read much of the article, automatically cancel the payment.
- eistrati 10y agoI love this idea :) I hope you don't mind if I'll implement it ;)
- sliverstorm 10y agoOf course not. I dream of the ad-free web. It's not a bulletproof idea of course, can be gamed. Users could take a screencap, or copy-paste, before the timer is up. But that's probably not worth worrying about until the model becomes widespread.
- Aldo_MX 10y agoI'm not sure that educating readers would be that difficult if you cater to a well-cultured audience, personally I like the approach of Smashing Magazine when you use an ad blocker: http://i.imgur.com/YpuvdlX.png http://i.imgur.com/YpuvdlX.png If I ran a blog I would include the same element, some wording like "you know, creating quality content requires more effort than spewing clickbait, mind leaving us a tip to let us know that you appreciate our efforts?" and a flattr button. Although your idea sounds like a good starting point for a website which caters to a massive audience (basically, every news website).