7 ms·
I have had good luck with fastmail.com, but at $30/year for the entry-level option it sits in what you classify as the "expensive" category. For a dedicated se
by bmh_ca 10y ago
I have had good luck with fastmail.com, but at $30/year for the entry-level option it sits in what you classify as the "expensive" category.
For a dedicated service with keen developers and ongoing product development (yay U2F support), great and accessible support, reasonable expectations of privacy, it has been well worth it. YMMV, of course.
- newscracker 10y agoThanks. That $20 a year was just an approximate amount. I wouldn't mind paying a little more. I've seen Fastmail recommended multiple times and have looked at it. Considering that I would actually want at least three or four "users" (access wise), the plans are quite expensive. The fact that each user can have up to 600 aliases (which sounds great and is useful) doesn't matter much to me since the billing is per user (as opposed to some kind of mix and match of users and aliases). This makes their business model not suitable for my needs.
- MOARDONGZPLZ 10y agoI've been using fastmail. I don't necessarily like it better than gmail, especially since I use hangouts for most of my conversations. however I outright dislike their mobile app, it won't load with no internet connection, like it doesn't cache anything. so maddening. I've been using it a few months paying $5/mo, but will likely discontinue it soon.