3 ms·
Each bacteriophage typically targets just one or at most few types of bacteria. The targeted treatment in many ways is an advantage because a phage treatment to
by slv77 10y ago
Each bacteriophage typically targets just one or at most few types of bacteria. The targeted treatment in many ways is an advantage because a phage treatment to target a pathogen wouldn't also wipe out the symbiotic bacteria that we are increasing finding act as part of our natural defense mechanism against pathogens.
The challenge for drug companies is that they would need to isolate and get regulatory approval for each pathogenic bacteria that they wanted to treat. Today one of the challenges that drug companies face with developing new antibiotics is that the profit models for antibiotics are poor compared to drugs that treat chronic conditions. With an antibiotic you sell one course of treatment per patient but with a diabetes drug , for example, you're selling a lifetime supply. With a phage your taking the already small pool of money for antibiotic treatment and dividing it by a hundred or a thousand.
The other challenge is that using phages as part of a treatment protocol the diagnosing physician would need to culture and identify the pathogenic bacteria and then order a specific phage for treatment which would increase the cost of diagnosis. One possibility would be creating cocktails of phages that would target many different strains of phages but that would require complex revenue sharing agreements unless all the phages were developed by one drug company.
And while phages work great in vitro the don't always work as well in vivo because they are ... viruses ... which the immune system will attempt to identify and destroy them. Phage therapy for a sore throat, for example, requires gargling a phages in liquid. Not as simple as popping a pill to treat a blood infection.
- DonaldFisk 10y agoOther than the last paragraph, the problems you mention are a market failure, which can be dealt with by having all aspects of phage therapy carried out within a government-owned health service, rather than by privately owned pharmaceutical companies. It's worth noting that phage therapy was successfully used in the Soviet Union, and is still used in Georgia where the phage was "farmed", and that attempts to commercialize it have (as far as I know) invariably failed. The clinical problems in administration of phage therapy to patients you mention are well-known and limit their use somewhat. But phage therapy could still be a valuable addition in the fight against pathogenic bacteria, rather than a replacement for antibiotics, which are more convenient, and work very well most of the time.
- TeMPOraL 10y agoI wonder if the economic reasons isn't exactly why phage research seems (AFAIR) to be coming mostly out of Russia.
- Fomite 10y agoPhage therapy comes mostly out of Russia because they had much more limited access to antibiotics once the Cold War kicked off, so established some of the best research groups for other alternatives. This was also why Germany, during the 2nd World War, were probably the world's experts in Sulfa.