3 ms·
Sounds like my use case for Flickr differs a lot from the ones mentioned here. I don't store everything there (Over a terabyte of raw photos etc is not worth pu
by trm42 10y ago
Sounds like my use case for Flickr differs a lot from the ones mentioned here. I don't store everything there (Over a terabyte of raw photos etc is not worth publishing;-), only photos I want to publish as an enthusiast photographer and see other photographers photos + talk about them. For that Flickr still trumps over 500px, Facebook* and any other service I've seen. Would've probably quit photography as a hobby multiple times without Flickr.
* Facebook is where other people are and there are some good groups but for really following other photographers it sucks + FB molesting JPEGs is just horrible.
- leemailll 10y agoFor social interaction Flickr still is the best. But I'm wondering whether 500px is better for the purpose to sell your photos
- saiya-jin 10y agoFB molesting JPEGs -> upload them as PNGs, reasonably sized and pray. with a bit of luck, none will be reprocessed into crappy JPEG with highest compression available effectively ruining them (yeah, shame for FB, generally it's a piece of sh_t when it comes to technical quality of the site, albeit much better compared to what bugfest it was few years ago)