There is a potential for misquoting people. Read the last line of the summary section here: http://cpedia.com/search?q=railsconf http://cpedia.com/search?q=ra

There is a potential for misquoting people. Read the last line of the summary section here: http://cpedia.com/search?q=railsconf http://cpedia.com/search?q=railsconf Read literally, Paul Krill was the author of the entire article after the summary. Because this content is pieced together by computers who have no idea of how the resulting piece reads as a whole, I wonder if there are hidden legal liabilities when words get stuffed into people's mouths or when the combinations of sections lead to false content (imagine one paragraph ending with "and found the following to be completely false:"). EDIT: Here's an article misquoting a lawyer. Not smart. ;) http://www.cpedia.com/wiki?q=palin#headline_31 http://www.cpedia.com/wiki?q=palin#headline_31