3 ms·
Wow, yeah. The first section is Merb ... ok. Then there's a ROR subsection of Merb. Um, what? And the first paragraph of the ROR subsection clearly was copied a
by jackowayed 17y ago
Wow, yeah. The first section is Merb ... ok. Then there's a ROR subsection of Merb. Um, what? And the first paragraph of the ROR subsection clearly was copied and pasted from some consultancy's "Our decicated RoR developers can create web 2.0 applications using latest Ruby on Rails web services." (Ok, not quite copied and pasted. They managed to work in a typo ("decicated").)
And then the paragraph immediately after that doesn't follow at all. It starts:
>When he [Brian Mastenbrook] was able to reproduce the glitch at Basecamp, he began to suspect that the flaw was inherent to Ruby on Rails, the popular Web framework used by both websites.
Did they do QA before launching this thing?
- timdoug 17y agoMy favorite Merb subsection: "g. I'll be at RailsConf in Berlin"
- senki 17y agohttp://www.cuil.com/info/blog/2010/04/08/introducing-cpedia-the-automated-encyclopedia http://www.cuil.com/info/blog/2010/04/08/introducing-cpedia-... >I find Cpedia best on topics that I thought I knew about. I find out things I should have known but didn’t. I’ve noticed productivity has slowed in the company since we have had it up for internal testing, as people ask each other about stranger and stranger trivia, or exclaim, “I didn’t know your middle name was Hector?”