3 ms·
It's not post facto justification at all I would suggest. The wording of "secret conspiracy" was inspired by the original posts this morning on this exact subj
by raesene9 10y ago
It's not post facto justification at all I would suggest.
The wording of "secret conspiracy" was inspired by the original posts this morning on this exact subject which cast the matter as exactly that, and it was those posts to which that comment was referring.
The idea that a single customer support representative would know something which was previously unknown and unstated across the positions of two of the largest corp's around seemed unlikely.
What I've been trying to suggest to multiple posters here (and apologies if you think the arguments are circular but people seem to keep bringing the same points up repeatedly) is this.
which is more likely, a mistake from one low-level employee of Lenovo or a deliberate plan by two large corporates to secretly (the use of secret is justified by the fact that it's not their stated position) use the disk driver configuration of a laptop to block alternate OS installs.
really which do you think is more likely?
- farcical_tinpot 10y ago> The idea that a single customer support representative would know something When you work at a company you have a funny way of finding things out, and you don't say things on forums or elsewhere that you don't mean to say :-). When somebody tells me something clearly and directly, and why, I tend to believe them. But I'm just funny like that.