4 ms·
If you need to save/encode images you really want mozjpeg instead.
by rockdoe 10y ago
If you need to save/encode images you really want mozjpeg instead.
- ploxiln 10y ago... but if you want something that is fast, you probably want libjpeg-turbo > When compared to baseline (the only mode that is fully accelerated in libjpeg-turbo), the combination of progressive JPEG, jpgcrush, and trellis quantization improved the compression ratio by 15-27% (average 20%) in our testing but increased encoding time by approximately 34-59x. More than half of the compression ratio improvement came from the use of progressive JPEG, which is supported in libjpeg-turbo as well. Decoding time was increased by anywhere from 17% to 3x, with most of this again being due to the use of progressive JPEG.
- brudgers 10y agoMore about the fork at the time it happened in 2014: http://www.libjpeg-turbo.org/About/Mozjpeg http://www.libjpeg-turbo.org/About/Mozjpeg