3 ms·
"Duplication" was the wrong term, I should have said "destructive-read/write", which I did in another comment. 2. There is no teleportation in the common man,
by TheRealPomax 10y ago
"Duplication" was the wrong term, I should have said "destructive-read/write", which I did in another comment.
2. There is no teleportation in the common man, sci-fi interpretation. In order to effect the information transferral we need three times as many particles as we're transferring the information of. Per particle whose state is to be tranferred, we need two entangled particles and a target particle. To translate that to the "teleporting a thing" case, if you were to teleport a cake, you'd need a cake, two (entangled) cake-equivalent mass collections, and a target "generic particle collection" to be turned into "your cake" after running the QT algorithm. It's only teleportation if you pretend that triplicate wasted-once-used mass isn't there, which we can't do: it's there, and this is QT, not 'regular' teleportation (ignoring the fact that there is no such thing outside of works of fiction =)
3. fair enough, I simplified that the wrong way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement#Applications https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement#Applicati... might work better as highlighting links here, although something like "Quantum Computation and Quantum Information" by Nielsen and Chuang would be a much better reference.
- adamsea 10y agoWhat common sci-fi man?