Interesting read. But I don't get how the author's (or anyone else's) idea falls outside solipsism. His conclusion is also a product of his mind. Why is it not

Interesting read. But I don't get how the author's (or anyone else's) idea falls outside solipsism. His conclusion is also a product of his mind. Why is it not susceptible to be considered a magic spell ? > What I’m saying is that the old good magic of small-l liberalism and technological innovation in the service of man rather than the replacement of man is pretty darn powerful itself, and the stories still inspire