3 ms·
Both, probably. I've heard the argument that because health care (or insurance) is a necessity of life so it should be provided by the government. Why doesn't
by spacehome 10y ago
Both, probably.
I've heard the argument that because health care (or insurance) is a necessity of life so it should be provided by the government. Why doesn't the same principle apply to food?
- chrismonsanto 10y ago> Why doesn't the same principle apply to food? It does, as well as access to water and shelter. Did you think universal health care was the "final boss"?
- vertex-four 10y agoActually... the Government heavily subsidises food and water. They don't go further because that'd be socialism and scare people.
- SamBam 10y agoBut it does. What do you think welfare is? We as a country have more than enough resources that people shouldn't have to starve on the streets if they happen to go bankrupt.