> In your analogy the Supreme Court would be the mother saying they may not. That assumes that the Supreme Court will judge according to the Constitution, whic

> In your analogy the Supreme Court would be the mother saying they may not. That assumes that the Supreme Court will judge according to the Constitution, which I think isn't borne out by case history. It was the Supreme Court which said a black man couldn't be a citizen; that wheat grown in one state and fed to cattle in the same state is involved in interstate commerce; that the death penalty referred to in the Constitution is unconstitutional; that taking property for private gain is a public taking; and on, and on, and on.