3 ms·
> That doesn't work. The only way to "destroy an entanglement" is to bring the entangled particles back together. Suppose a proton A is entangled with a proton
by MichaelBurge 10y ago
> That doesn't work. The only way to "destroy an entanglement" is to bring the entangled particles back together.
Suppose a proton A is entangled with a proton B. If B hits an anti-proton C, it gets converted into pure energy(maybe light and heat?). If it's impossible to destroy entanglement, then the subsystem consisting of the light and heat must be entangled with the original particle.
Observations:
* The dimension of the vector space has increased, since there may be many constituent photons released. So it may be impossible to assign a specific dimension to any quantum state.
* What is the rule for determining the resulting quantum state? Is there a book or article?
* If you convert a particle entirely into an electromagnetic wave or gravitational waves, and then reconstruct it, does that preserve entanglement? What is the rule for describing how the dimension of the vector space changes as it undergoes multiple transformations? If entanglement is allowed to propagate to a continuous field, then it seems like you'd have an uncountable infinite dimensional vector space to describe its state.
- lisper 10y ago> the subsystem consisting of the light and heat must be entangled with the original particle Yes. Exactly right. That is how/why decoherence happens. That is the reason the universe appears to be classical, and why the arrow of time seems to move in only one direction. The rest of your questions are essentially asking me to teach you all of QM, and that's obviously not possible in an HN comment. You'll have to take a class or read a book.