3 ms·

You're describing a problem with the prosecutor's office, not the police union.

• 1024core 10y ago
  Problem is: the prosecutor's office depends on the cops to do its job. If it starts prosecuting cops, they will stop cooperating, making its job almost impossible. And cops will outright sabotage inquiries into their own conduct. Case in point: in the Freddie Gray case in Baltimore, the police had failed to serve search warrants for the officers’ personal cellphones.
  • rayiner 10y ago
    > Case in point: in the Freddie Gray case in Baltimore, the police had failed to serve search warrants for the officers’ personal cellphones. And if they had been Wal-Mart greeters instead of union employees, they would've been fired on the spot.
  • jahnu 10y ago
    They should have a separate prosecutor's office for the authorities. Why doesn't I.A. do it?
• John23832 10y ago
  I am describing a problem where police unions hinder prosecution. And they hinder prosecution in a way that essentially amounts to blackmail. They threaten that the police force will become less cooperative with the prosecutors office. An office that depends of the force to do it's job. A prosecutor should be able to look into charges against a police force without fear of retribution by said force. But they can't. And police unions are the spokespersons/ringleaders of the entire scheme.
  • brainfire 10y ago
    Wouldn't that still be a problem without a union?