Because if they do similar things, they must use the same code? Better tell Microsoft that Apple's ripping them off. I mean, they're both x86-based graphical

Because if they do similar things, they must use the same code? Better tell Microsoft that Apple's ripping them off. I mean, they're both x86-based graphical operating systems, right? Don't accuse people without evidence, especially long-standing members of the community like Daeken, of stealing. The fact that you spammed Daeken's blog with comments promoting exepack (forcing him to disable comments) doesn't help either. Then again, some of your comments were pure gold. For example: "Your product" name is DotPack and open source ExePack ; Pack part of the name the same . coincidence ? To much coincidence in this case . (FYI, I've worked on a portion of DotPack's code, specifically optimizing the LZMA unpacker module, and while that portion was not original code, the original source was a public domain LZMA unpacker. We ended up rewriting practically the whole thing anyways because of how badly it was written. The end result was something like half the size of the original.)