3 ms·
You could argue that the FBI's use case does not harm, perpeutatue, or endorse the exploitation of children any further. It would be a different story if the FB
by chrischen 10y ago
You could argue that the FBI's use case does not harm, perpeutatue, or endorse the exploitation of children any further. It would be a different story if the FBI also commissioned new content to run the site.
- kiproping 10y agoIt's really surprising the faux moral outrage. Children will continue to be exploited because of technicalities.
- Lawtonfogle 10y agoSince distribution and even possesion are crimes because they hurt children this argument does not hold up.
- aw3c2 10y agoYou could argue that "mere" possession of such material does not either, yet that is not how the law is interpreted.
- vlehto 10y agoCould there be some kind of "allowed CP database"? I'm asking because I might donate my old childhood photos to such database. I really would not mind if someone jacked of to that stuff. If that could help to prevent some pedophile acting out their urges, it would be really great. Is this too weird idea for HN?
- chrischen 10y agoBut possession drives demand. The FBI's case wouldn't drive demand from the producers.