>The raw truth is that algorithms are nowhere near as good as real people at recognizing human faces and emotions. While this is true, it fallaciously implies

>The raw truth is that algorithms are nowhere near as good as real people at recognizing human faces and emotions. While this is true, it fallaciously implies that the performance he describes from iPhoto is the best that computer vision can do. I'm the first to rag on the shortcomings of vision, but implemented properly, it can certainly do better than: >people with completely different facial features and even gender are easily confused by the program.