"no null result, no complete experimental failure" Well, here, have a look at all the nice excluded theories. https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic

"no null result, no complete experimental failure" Well, here, have a look at all the nice excluded theories. https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/SupersymmetryPublicResults https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/Supersymmet... https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResultsSUS https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResult... And here's Michael E Peskin (of the Supersymmetry Working Group) quoted on the late 2015 results: http://www.nature.com/news/lhc-sees-hint-of-boson-heavier-than-higgs-1.19036 http://www.nature.com/news/lhc-sees-hint-of-boson-heavier-th... "To theoretical physicist Michael Peskin of the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory in Menlo Park, California, the most relevant part of the talks concerned the failure to find a supersymmetric particle called a gluino in the range of masses up to 1,600 GeV (much farther than the 1,300-GeV limit of run 1). This pushes supersymmetry closer to the point at which many physicists might give up on it, Peskin says." The "not even wrong" label does not actually apply to your impolite comment; it's just wrong.