2 ms·
> just to ignore it and move on? No. That's what courts are for. This notion that you (in the general sense) should publicly shame businesses and people over
by mangeletti 10y ago
> just to ignore it and move on?
No. That's what courts are for.
This notion that you (in the general sense) should publicly shame businesses and people over private concerns is absurd.
- pyre 10y agoOn the other hand, the idea that large entities should be able to get away with "small" transgressions just because it would be too costly than is worth it to pursue litigation isn't exactly the best situation either. I'm not saying that's the case here, but I can definitely see people at a large company working that sort of logic into their decision-making process. If all they had to do was ignore the "small guy" and he would eventually go away (due to the cost of long-protracted legal battle against an opponent with deep pockets), then they would.