3 ms·
So your idea of R&D is essentially random, but because you'll occasionally happen upon something useful, don't knock it? Truly, the philosophy of science is de
by M_Grey 10y ago
So your idea of R&D is essentially random, but because you'll occasionally happen upon something useful, don't knock it?
Truly, the philosophy of science is dead.
- bertiewhykovich 10y agoThat's not at all what I'm suggesting. I am not advocating for the arbitrary assignment of confidence intervals, expected values, or whatever your chosen epistemological metric is -- I am advocating for restraint in assigning falsity to what we merely cannot assign truth. Logical positivism is not boundary of philosophy of science.
- M_Grey 10y agoThere's a difference between, "Can't assign truth" and "Not testable or falsifiable." A difference I hope not to have to explain.