3 ms·
You and your friends with your 100+ years of security clearance holding are free to have an opinion on Clinton's handling of her private email server. What you
by koube 10y ago
You and your friends with your 100+ years of security clearance holding are free to have an opinion on Clinton's handling of her private email server.
What you cannot reasonably do, is take the legal opinion of the Director of the FBI, that the Clinton case is different from the Petraeus case, and disagree based on the fact that you have 100+ years of security clearance holding.
I have explained to you key points in James Comey's legal opinion that the Petraeus situation is not applicable to Clinton. I'm sure you're more knowledgeable than I in some area or another, however that doesn't change the fact that the legal position of the FBI has already decided. You can disagree if you want, in the same way people from the internet disagree that climate change exists. I am not interested your vague insinuations.
- patrickg_zill 10y agoI am not writing about the narrow issues of Petraeus vs Clinton but about the well known and well understood, by some 6 million current and former security clearance holders, methods and requirements of handling classified info. Petraeus vs Clinton is a red herring, I didn't mention Petraeus. I was referring to the case of Brian Nishimura. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-05/peak-fbi-corruption-meet-bryan-nishimura-found-guilty-removal-and-retention-classifi http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-05/peak-fbi-corruption...
- koube 10y agoYou linked to an article that only mentioned Petraeus in your previous comment. Regardless, Comey spoke briefly on Nishimura as well so my response is the same. http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1607/07/wolf.01.html http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1607/07/wolf.01.html