7 ms·
no reason imho..the function is pretty trivial. But also not a reason not to use it as a performance impact would be minimal :-)
by barpet 10y ago
no reason imho..the function is pretty trivial.
But also not a reason not to use it as a performance impact would be minimal :-)
- nabucodonosor 10y agounderstood. thank you.
- junke 10y agoThe behavior is different if a panic occurs, isn't it? But is there any chance that this particular initialization code might panic in the first place?
- schmichael 10y agoGiven the current code and no races against the values being initialized: no, there is no chance for a panic.
- alpb 10y agoThis is not a good assumption. The code will panic, for instance when it can't allocate memory, or runs into signal handling issues.