Its a good middle of an essay. The first half of the article is a rephrasing of the organizational strategy of focusing hard on things closer to you (in time,

Its a good middle of an essay. The first half of the article is a rephrasing of the organizational strategy of focusing hard on things closer to you (in time, priority, physically, financial, whatever) and intentionally fuzzier on things far away but remember to at least glance at everything once in a while. Its that strategy dis-integrated into seemingly unrelated parts without referencing the whole, although I was able to identify the whole. I'm too lazy to look up the dude who originally wrote that, probably wrote it more eloquently than I did; none of this paragraph is my idea. The second half of the article isn't integrated or I can't recognize what was dis-integrated to make it. The problem of doing whatever's necessary paragraph isn't a purity problem or personal problem or usually everything turns out OK, but is often a code smell problem, which can be counteracted at least partially by the be organized enough paragraph, just comment the code as smelly and list it as needing rewriting in the TODO and hope it runs until it can be perfected. Likewise having deadlines and I can do a lot are dis-integrated. There probably is a theme to the second part that was dis-integrated that I can't identify. I guess both complaints boil down to it needs a wrapper. An intro like "heres how to break down and concretely apply two wide ranging theoretical and vague organizational strategies (names here) that help me (insert the rest of the intro explaining why its important to do so here)" And a summary/conclusion of the highlights and if you liked this here are some google terms/references etc. Its "why" and "how" are well written and correct, its just missing its "what". Its the meaty middle of a good essay, although an intro and conclusion (and references) would have been nice additions.