3 ms·
Any real developer would not in good conscience be able to support this. I hate such broad-sweeping statements. What is clear is that Apple most definitely wo
by nopal 17y ago
Any real developer would not in good conscience be able to support this.
I hate such broad-sweeping statements.
What is clear is that Apple most definitely would [abuse their loyal users and make them pawns for the sake of trying to hurt another company].
Apple has always been about the experience of using their products, and I think a lot of what they're doing with their mobile devices still stems from that focus. Maybe they're being too heavy handed, but, then again, they're not allowing grandma's phone to be overrun with software that affects the perception of the device itself.
Comments disabled as I’m not interested in hearing from the Cupertino Comment SPAM bots.
I also find this highly patronizing.
- pyre 17y ago> they're not allowing grandma's phone to be overrun with software that affects the perception of the device itself. That may be fine if you're 'just producing devices,' but Apple presents the iPhone and the iPad as the 'future of computing' with a vision of all computing being done on devices like this in the future. Therefore the way they treat their devices' ecosystem now should be a predictor of how they see their role in the ecosystem in the future, a future where their devices are the only devices.
- rbanffy 17y ago> Any real developer would not in good conscience be able to support this. > I hate such broad-sweeping statements. I know no "real developer" who really likes Flash either, so, I find all this "oh no we want Flash" thing rather amusing.
- kelnos 17y ago>> Comments disabled as I’m not interested in hearing from the Cupertino Comment SPAM bots. > I also find this highly patronizing. Patronizing? Sure... Incorrect? Probably not.