4 ms·
Quite a milestone for Julia, and an important step forward towards stability as well: I believe a core Julia team member (Viral Shah IIRC) said that there would
by sundarurfriend 10y ago
Quite a milestone for Julia, and an important step forward towards stability as well: I believe a core Julia team member (Viral Shah IIRC) said that there would be only one or two major releases between 0.5 and 1.0.
One thing I like about Julia development is how receptive they are to community ideas, while also making sure the suggestions fit into the larger pattern and rejecting those that don't. (The "Support for arrays with indexing starting at values different from 1" thing does worry me, since it has the potential to screw things up gloriously, but it seems[1] they predicted HN will gnaw at this one. :) And I'm yet to read the whole of that issue, maybe it'll end up convincing me it's a good idea.)
[1] https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/16260 https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/16260
- mvardin 10y agoGiven the long list of "breaking changes" and "Deprecated or removed" I think it is premature to suggest that they are moving towards stability.
- cschmidt 10y agoI think the idea is that they're trying to make the breaking changes sooner rather than later. It should settle down after this release.
- mauro3 10y agoThe outlook toward Julia 1.0 was given by Stefan Karpinski in his JuliaCon 2016 talk: https://youtu.be/5gXMpbY1kJY https://youtu.be/5gXMpbY1kJY . But yes, the plan is to have a 0.6 and then 1.0.