3 ms·
Though critical reading of raw data can reveal fake entry, witch is equally interesting. I agree that replication will always be better and should ideally be m
by Twisell 10y ago
Though critical reading of raw data can reveal fake entry, witch is equally interesting.
I agree that replication will always be better and should ideally be mandatory. But meta-review is still way better than nothing.
And sometimes you just can't replicate for various reasons.
- dangerlibrary 10y agoI don't think it's obvious that meta-review is better than nothing. It can lend credence to incorrect/fraudulent results, making actual replication appear less important.