Yeah, while I'm sorry for my other, idiotic comment in sub-thread thread... I don't understand how you could think that's "pretty clear". Why would he seek hel

Yeah, while I'm sorry for my other, idiotic comment in sub-thread thread... I don't understand how you could think that's "pretty clear". Why would he seek help on doing it in a way that is difficult to impossible, compared to redacting/tokenizing after export? That makes zero sense. On the other hand, doing it this way would prevent the normal justice-based extraction procedures from working, because subpoenas are specific to people usually. I can't see any advantage of doing the hard way, other than that... it's hard for me to imagine a lawyer or professional investigator employee making direct use of a PST file or the equivalent.