3 ms·
"A person who is a creator will build and write things regardless of the copyright protections." That's an interesting thought, but almost certainly not true.
by decode 16y ago
"A person who is a creator will build and write things regardless of the copyright protections."
That's an interesting thought, but almost certainly not true. Some forms of creation require a large amount of time and effort. Some people will squeeze in time around their jobs and friends and families no matter what so that they can create. Other people will not.
But even if you're right, I want some creative people to be able to create full time. If I can get twice the output from Neal Stephenson or John Darnielle or Linus Torvalds because they don't have to work a separate day job, that is a world I want to promote. This doesn't mean that copyrights should be defined the way they are, or that copyrights are even the way to achieve this world, but don't act like economic compensation for creativity isn't useful.
- bediger 16y agoSorry, but the record seems to indicate that your viewpoint, although common and valiantly expressed, is wrong: http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090308/1022324034.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090308/1022324034.shtml Copyright on music got introduced part way through composer Giuseppe Verdi's career. He clearly coasted for the latter part. Want more from Stephenson or Torvalds or even Stephen King? Shorten or eliminate copyright.