3 ms·
Well, the point is not necessarily that it can be reversed. The point is that society takes the stand that taking a human life, no matter how debased, is barbar
by fsloth 10y ago
Well, the point is not necessarily that it can be reversed. The point is that society takes the stand that taking a human life, no matter how debased, is barbarous. Of course, this takes us to euthanasia and abortion territory, so we could modify this by saying that taking a human life without a deathwhish and consent is barbarous - just as prolonging life beyond a certain point.
A good example of a candidate for life imprisonment is a mass murderer who has obviously shot tens of peoples without any remorse and boasts doing it again. The crime is not debatable - the question then remains - how should a society respond to such a situation.
- omginternets 10y agoThis was in response to the specific argument that life sentences can be reversed, which I don't think constitutes a strong argument.
- fsloth 10y agoAh, yes now I see your point. I agree, it confounds the discussion.