3 ms·
If you start to look at the "different ways" claims, they fall apart pretty quickly with basic logic. One of the most common claims I hear is that someone is a
by awesomerobot 10y ago
If you start to look at the "different ways" claims, they fall apart pretty quickly with basic logic.
One of the most common claims I hear is that someone is a "visual" learner.
If that were true, wouldn't it also mean that we're leaving kids behind that learn through taste? What if I'm an olfactory genius and I should be learning maths through scent?
- nanny 10y ago>One of the most common claims I hear is that someone is a "visual" learner. If that were true, wouldn't it also mean that we're leaving kids behind that learn through taste? How does that follow at all? I fail to see any logic here, let alone "basic" logic.
- jasonkostempski 10y agoTry smelling the logic.
- awesomerobot 10y agoIf someone learns better through sight, there must be someone that also learns better through other senses right? What are learning "types" often limited to only cognitive/spacial?
- nanny 10y ago>If someone learns better through sight, there must be someone that also learns better through other senses right? No? Why does the existence of a sight-learner imply that there must be a taste-learner?