> It was my understanding that the program was being undermined by landlords illegally refusing to accept the rental vouchers If that is indeed the case, I rea

> It was my understanding that the program was being undermined by landlords illegally refusing to accept the rental vouchers If that is indeed the case, I really can't blame them. Who would want a likely mentally unstable homeless person living on their property? I'm sure the expected property damage is substantially higher than from a standard tenant. Forcing landlords to take "vouchers" for high-risk tenants is essentially forcing much of the cost of homelessness away from the city and onto the landlords.