3 ms·
Pay attention: "you just don't see it" == "they take it from the company" Your assertion that a company wouldn't pay more without a recruiter makes no sense. P
by einarvollset 10y ago
Pay attention: "you just don't see it" == "they take it from the company"
Your assertion that a company wouldn't pay more without a recruiter makes no sense. Particularly if they're sourcing candidates off a trusted source
Ps. I suspect your comments get downvotes because they come across as rash and not very well thought through.
- bbcbasic 10y agoIt makes sense from a simple supply/demand point of view. You only pay what you have to. Why pay the candidate more just because you saved some money elsewhere. That could be just added to the bottom line, used for growth etc. Now if the candidate is strong, a good negotiator, and all their competing candidates went through a recruiter then they may be able to claw back some of that as a pay rise. But I guess in most cases, not.