7 ms·
That may be a very good book, but I'll be honest, it doesn't look like a very gentle introduction.
by ktRolster 10y ago
That may be a very good book, but I'll be honest, it doesn't look like a very gentle introduction.
- acjohnson55 10y agoIt's not :(. Although the average person could probably get a lot of good high-level info by browsing it. I haven't yet come across anything that is a good gentle intro. Most resources that approach music and math make the mistake of treating music theory like the law, without any rationale for it provided. Music history textbooks typically give a lot more context of how our music theories emerged, but they don't talk about why that might be, based on acoustics, psychoacoustic, and math. Maybe one day, I'll write the comprehensive intro I wish I'd had.
- ktRolster 10y agoDoes that book provide anything helpful to someone who already understand music theory?
- acjohnson55 10y agoOh most definitely! I'd describe it as an extension of what's taught in the standard music theory curriculum. It makes the very ambitious claim of developing a framework that can be used to analyze all tonal music, from the renaissance to the present.