3 ms·
The fact that you mentioned that memristors were "built a long time ago", when they were first built in 2008, clearly shows you are an outsider who has no clue
by Rod 16y ago
The fact that you mentioned that memristors were "built a long time ago", when they were first built in 2008, clearly shows you are an outsider who has no clue what he's talking about. I suggest you pick some elementary books on electronics and solid state physics and that you abstain from posting your ignorant rants on HN until you have something remotely insightful to add.
The following articles would be a good starting point:
http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/print/7024 http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/print/7024
http://www.technologyreview.com/Nanotech/20718 http://www.technologyreview.com/Nanotech/20718
http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/21710 http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/21710
http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2009/01/logic-circuits-that-program-themselves-memristors-in-action.ars http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2009/01/logic-circuits-...
Now that daddy is back from the kitchen, it's time for you to leave daddy's computer and go back to your crib to play with your silly putty.
- ramidarigaz 16y agoI value the overall content of your comment, but your tone is downright ugly.
- Rod 16y agoYou can't predict where technology will be in 10 years. Anyone who claims that fundamental research in some field is useless and / or that it will never go anywhere is... well... a fool. History has taught us again and again that the purpose of futurism is to make astrology look respectable (paraphrasing Galbraith). The fact that HN upvotes trolls such as the one in question is worrying. There should be zero tolerance for self-important brag-a-lots. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Last but not least, using one's boss to make a point, without providing any context or background is utterly sophomoric. Kids these days...
- TheSOB88 16y agoI hope you have a nice life.