4 ms·
> Also, this notation has a slight problem. That problem is that sheet music is terrible. > This has got to be some of the worst jargon and notation for anythi
by dietrichepp 10y ago
> Also, this notation has a slight problem. That problem is that sheet music is terrible.
> This has got to be some of the worst jargon and notation for anything, ever.
I hear it bandied around in these articles that music notation is awful. Can someone explain to me why? I'm not much of a musician, but I can work my way through sheet music if necessary, or write it when I want to. I don't remember what it was like to learn to read and write music so I'm not going to understand why it's so bad just by thinking about it.
First of all, the lines and spaces make a ton of sense to me. When you're playing, reading, or writing a piece, you spend most of your time in a key with a diatonic scale. Maybe you're thinking about the chords: I, vi, ii, V7. The lines and spaces are great for giving you that kind of information. I guess this "completely obscures the relationship between the pitches". I guess that's the case if you forget what key you're playing in. The alternative would be to make the staff fully chromatic, but that sounds like it has a bunch of disadvantages for most music.
The chromatic staff (http://musicnotation.org/ http://musicnotation.org/) looks terrible to me, since it spreads out the notes farther. I've already memorized all of the diatonic scales, and now the diatonic scales are jumping around, and the staff covers a shorter interval so you get more of those 8va or 15ma.
Hummingbird (http://www.hummingbirdnotation.com/ http://www.hummingbirdnotation.com/) seems like classical notation, just with more redundancy and the symbols changed around a little bit. Maybe it's better but it's a minor improvement at best.
Clairnote (http://clairnote.org/ http://clairnote.org/) looks the worst of them all, with half-steps being half-way between lines and spaces. It looks like a recipe for making mistakes and misreading music.
I'm not about to say that it's easy to read music notation, just that the notation seems to have a reasonable amount of logic to it. The idea that somehow it's the notation that's terrible and music itself would be easier to understand or play if we just had better notation--I don't buy it. Maybe someone could convince me.
(Addendum: If you think the chromatic scale is the "right" scale for notating most music, as in "Chromatic staff" or "Clairnote", as an exercise... why do you think that the chromatic scale is correct? Is it because it represents both sets of keys on the piano or the frets on a guitar? Is it because of the mathematical relationship between the notes? My counterargument, against the chromatic scale, is presented by Bobby McFerrin: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ne6tB2KiZuk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ne6tB2KiZuk)
- hexane360 10y agoI think the "completely obscures the relationship between the pitches" is more about the relationship to the tonal than anything else. A note a full step above the tonal sounds the same in any key. When first glancing at a piece of music, the relationship is obscured; to tell something is a perfect fifth from the tonal, you first need to recognize the tonal.
- dietrichepp 10y agoI'm not sure what you mean by "perfect fifth away from the tonal". Do you mean tonic? Perfect fifths are easy to recognize, they're notes which are both on lines or both on spaces, and there is a small gap between them. Yes, you have to remember that one of the fifths is diminished, but only one of them. Meanwhile, all the thirds are easier to recognize, since they have the same spacing. I would love to see an alternative notation that is demonstrably easier to read. That is, there's a big difference between "it's hard because music notation is an inherently difficult problem" and "it's hard because the notation we chose sucks".
- hexane360 10y agoYes, I did mean tonic. Yes, it's easy to tell a fifth relative to the root of a chord. What I'm talking about is the chord relative to the tonic.
- dietrichepp 10y agoSo, you're looking for relative chord names? Like IV V I? Can't you just write those above the staff?
- djaychela 10y agoI think it's because a lot of people saying that don't really know (and I mean really well) their scales; if you do then it's "obvious" that (say) an F is a semitone above an E, despite that gap on the stave looking the same as F to G. All the musicians I know who can read well know their scales inside out. I'm a bad reader, but my reading has improved considerably over the last couple of years as the scales have become something that I know really well (in simpler keys). Then it turns into a "how could you -not- know that?" kind of deal, internally. I think that's the missing piece from most people's ability to read well; not the actual reading, but grokking the key that you're in so it just becomes 'obvious'. I'm not there yet!