3 ms·
They briefly allowed some industry people to look at a few of the documents, like Bruce Schneier who said he wished he could have had more time instead of being
by feklar 10y ago
They briefly allowed some industry people to look at a few of the documents, like Bruce Schneier who said he wished he could have had more time instead of being placed in front of a live OS with a few dozen pdfs the Guardian wanted him to review. As for OPSEC there was the time the Guardian leaked the password to the first Wikileaks large Manning dump (the Assange hotel napkin PGP password incident), then they actually wrote Op-Ed attack pieces on Assange for "releasing unredacted classified information".
- tptacek 10y agoThe fact that it was people like Bruce Schneier who got access to the document, and not, say, Bruce Leidl, is a big part of my problem with the process used to evaluate the documents.
- blackguardx 10y agoWhat is wrong with Bruce Schneier?
- tptacek 10y agoNothing is wrong with Bruce Schneier.
- throwawaymaroon 10y agoYou know what he is asking, answer the question or don't. >>The fact that it was people like Bruce Schneier who got access to the documents [...] is a big part of my problem with the process... Clarify.
- ENOTTY 10y agoSchneier is a well-regarded expert on cryptography, but outside of that domain, he appears to have very little relevant experience.
- tptacek 10y agoI'm just thinking there are people with a lot more time to dedicate to the project than he has.