4 ms·
Until an iPhone can provide the tactile satisfaction of pressing buttons or the current generation of gamers prefers a touch interface, IMO, no. Pardon the pun
by Mark_B 17y ago
Until an iPhone can provide the tactile satisfaction of pressing buttons or the current generation of gamers prefers a touch interface, IMO, no. Pardon the pun, but iPhone vs. Nintendo gaming is like comparing Apples to Oranges.
- roc 17y agoTouch-screens can be a serious threat, even without directly replacing all things a traditional handheld is good at. It just needs to reduce the argument for a dedicated gaming device, by providing enough games that the DS' audience enjoys. Touch Screens are no good for a MegaMan. But games on the order of Cooking Mama, Nintendogs, Brain Age, Pokemon, Final Fantasy, Harvest Moon, etc -- these make up a huge slice of the DS' most-popular titles. And they don't need buttons.
- nickelplate 17y agoI think that as long as Mario and Zelda will require buttons, Nintendo will be safe.
- roc 17y agoSafe, certainly. But potentially finding themselves moving significantly less product to significantly fewer users. Consider the home console situation: The PS2 had its run of the console business. But the PS3 is struggling to expand out of the core gamer niche. Sony's 'safe' in that the MGS, God of War and Final Fantasy fans aren't going anywhere. But the more-numerous, more-casual gamers, even the gamers who had PS2s and bought God of War, bought Wiis instead. And the Wii does enough games well enough that it's harder to convince them to buy the PS3 and God of War 3, even though they know they'll never get a game quite like GoW3 on their Wii.
- winthrowe 17y agoLinked from the article, patent application for game cotroller shell: http://www.pcworld.com/article/193322/is_apple_developing_game_controls_for_the_ipad_and_iphone.html http://www.pcworld.com/article/193322/is_apple_developing_ga...