3 ms·
Did you see the video? That was even worst that wasting a pitch that might end up in the dirt near the plate, but this was a good 3 feet in front and 2 feet wid
by jnordwick 10y ago
Did you see the video? That was even worst that wasting a pitch that might end up in the dirt near the plate, but this was a good 3 feet in front and 2 feet wide of the plate. The only reason the catcher got it was the ball had enough spin to bounce back into the catcher and not away.
- dionidium 10y agoWhich is why I said that, "the pitch shown in the video almost certainly just got away from him." But, the main reason I'm responding is to say that this pitch definitely isn't worse (for any reasonable definition) than a pitch that misses closer to the plate. There are no runners on base and this is the first pitch in the at bat. It doesn't matter if the catcher catches it or not. It's a dead ball. He could have thrown this pitch 15 feet over Phillips's head and into the stands and the outcome is the same.