3 ms·
The NY Times article was more informative: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/01/technology/01hp-Web.html http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/01/technology/01hp-Web.html
by wheaties 17y ago
The NY Times article was more informative: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/01/technology/01hp-Web.html http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/01/technology/01hp-Web.html Looks like it's 10x slower than DRAM. It might make it to market in 3 years but if it's speed is as slow, who will buy? Regardless, I'm still encouraged science marches onward.
- khafra 17y agoIf it's RAM that's nonvolatile and one order of magnitude slower than DRAM, shouldn't we just call it flash memory? A bit disappointing that a huge leap in applying theory to physical objects duplicated what we already have with NAND memory.