4 ms·
Laser sucks for printing photos.
by clarry 10y ago
Laser sucks for printing photos.
- imglorp 10y agoYeah but if you want documents and shelf life (toner doesn't dry out in a year) then lasers might be better for you.
- dghughes 10y agoI think I'm on year three for my laser printer colour toner cartridges. I did have to swap out the black after two years maybe 2 1/2 but I ran it for six months with errors and warnings and pleading.
- tdkl 10y agoTrue although cost of printing photos on an inkjet is again much higher then getting them printed in a shop.
- CydeWeys 10y agoIs there a reason that Shutterfly or other similar services don't satisfy those needs? I try not to own things anymore unless I use them frequently (lessons learned after moving twice in Manhattan), and printing color photos definitely isn't a frequent need for me, or I suspect, for most people.
- artursapek 10y agoEspecially in Manhattan! You're always a few blocks away from a place that will do it for you for a reasonable price.
- Spooky23 10y agoYou'll get better quality from shutterfly, apple, etc. If you need something quick, most CVS and RiteAid stores let you Sunil photos online and pickup in 1-3 hours.