3 ms·
620 words per minute? While I do not have any form of visual impairment, I wonder how useful it would be to be able to absorb spoken information at that pace.
by mrkgnao 10y ago
620 words per minute? While I do not have any form of visual impairment, I wonder how useful it would be to be able to absorb spoken information at that pace.
Can anyone tell me more about this?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- PatentTroll 10y agoThat stood out to me too, I imagine it's more akin to 'skimming' than reading each word for comprehension. Most legal documents are highly repetitive, full of legalese filler, and generally you just need to get the gist of something quickly rather than analyze it on a small scale. I bet that when he's carefully writing or reading an important clause it's at much less than 10 words a second.
- hobs 10y agoProbably not "much less", I am not vision impaired but I use TTS every day; over time it becomes easier and easier to listen to higher and higher frequency speech (if the speaker can actually enunciate that fast.) I currently use the fastest built in voice speed windows (by default) offers and I believe that is just slightly slower than 10 words per second(8 or 9.)