4 ms·
I'd argue strenuously against Ubuntu: it's basically Debian without the good parts. The choice is to follow RHEL because that's what the mothership forces you
by wtbob 10y ago
I'd argue strenuously against Ubuntu: it's basically Debian without the good parts.
The choice is to follow RHEL because that's what the mothership forces you into, Ubuntu because that's what the cool kids are into, or Debian because you want to get work done.
I want to get work done.
- veddox 10y ago> I'd argue strenuously against Ubuntu: it's basically Debian without the good parts. Oh, please don't start that flame war! You can get work done any distro, if you are going to start distro-bashing, at least bring some proper arguments.
- slgeorge 10y agoOh total pish! I'm not going to start that war, but please at least reason from a factual basis. It's a silly war, Ubuntu reaches parts of the Linux (and other OS) that Debian doesn't target. If you think Debian is better you should value Ubuntu for being an on-ramp. Honestly, dividing FOSS (or Linux) users is a bad play - we're all part of the same family, there's more that joins us than divides us.