6 ms·
True, but as far as I know California has never funded homeless programs at the state level. The only thing listed in the 2015 budget is: "Housing Support Prog
by quinnchr 10y ago
True, but as far as I know California has never funded homeless programs at the state level. The only thing listed in the 2015 budget is:
"Housing Support Program — The Budget contains $35 million General Fund for
CalWORKs Housing Support Program services, an increase of $15 million, which
provides additional support to CalWORKs families for whom homelessness is a
barrier to self‐sufficiency."
Which leaves medicaid spending, which according to my previous source only 20% of the homeless population in SF receive. Assuming medicaid pays the same amount poer person as in NYC that would bring the per capita homeless expenditure to about $35000.
- mdorazio 10y agoThis is no longer the case. The state recently approved $2B in funding to build and maintain housing for the mentally ill homeless [1]. That's close to $70k per homeless person with mental illness, or an additional $17,500 per homeless person if we don't group by mental illness. [1] http://fox40.com/2016/06/27/california-lawmakers-approve-2-billion-for-homeless-housing/ http://fox40.com/2016/06/27/california-lawmakers-approve-2-b...
- reid_fatman 10y agoExactly. People are "homeless" because it makes economic sense for them to be homeless.
- aminok 10y agoWhy does Thailand have so fewer mentally ill and drug addicted homeless, despite its government spending so much less on social programs for the homeless?
- afarrell 10y agoPerhaps for the same reason that head injury rates were lower in WWI before steel helmets were introduced: the mortality rate was higher.
- technomancy 10y agoI live in Thailand (but not in a big city). Out here it's because if you find yourself without a home, you can go build one out of bamboo. If you have some friends to help you, it can be done in a week.
- 0max 10y agoThe key being that the municipality won't give you crap for an "illegal settlement" until the land you're occupying suddenly becomes worth something.
- dsfyu404ed 10y agoIt doesn't have to be worth squat. Your "settlement" just has to rub someone with too much time on their hands the wrong way.
- aminok 10y agoRepealing zoning and building restrictions would go a long way to making the West the same. Land titles enforcement would still put up impediments to construction of makeshift housing, but making it so anyone with land can build a structure without needing a building permit or being limited by zoning would make the creation of housing supply significantly easier. Land is not all that expensive, after all.