13 ms·
This is a complicated problem and I admit that I don't have a good understanding of law or social studies... so take this with a grain of salt. I sometimes won
by weerd 10y ago
This is a complicated problem and I admit that I don't have a good understanding of law or social studies... so take this with a grain of salt.
I sometimes wonder if we have a little too much freedom in this country. Heroine/meth/alcohol mixed with mental issues have demolished the lives of many people. They turn bitter and blue. Life becomes a loop of temporary satisfaction through chemical escape.
The ones that end on the streets are often not violent, and I don't believe they belong in prison. But defiling public spaces with needles and shit is not acceptable. Fines and nights in jail don't matter to them, but freedom on the other hand...
I imagine a state institution somewhere between jail and trade school. Drug use would be tolerated to some extent. Food, shelter, and hopefully some sense of community are provided, along with opportunities to learn useful skills.
I realize this is idealistic and that the monetary cost would probably be immense. I'm just sick of all the biohazards strewn across the city and felt like wondering out loud.
- sandworm101 10y ago> I sometimes wonder if we have a little too much freedom in this country. No, you don't. Many of the problems faced by the poor arise specifically from restrictions and limitations on freedom. The number of US persons perpetually disenfranchised by poverty is hard to comprehend. They have fewer rights, not too many. The disparate treatment of poor people by the justice system tops my list. Poor drug users face convictions, and thereafter perpetual unemployment, while the rich are diverted to programs without convictions (see Rush Limbaugh). The rich are also allowed to self-medicate with prescriptions whereas the poor turn to illegal drugs (again, see Rush). To exacerbate this by rounding up the poor into camps only sweeps the problem under the rug.