3 ms·
As I referred to multiple times, they were expanding to include other expertise besides nuclear and political. What about that don't you get? Unless you want to
by hackinthebochs 10y ago
As I referred to multiple times, they were expanding to include other expertise besides nuclear and political. What about that don't you get? Unless you want to argue that even with this expanded scope he was not qualified, you're just blowing hot air.
- leereeves 10y agoThat's the board's description now. He was appointed in 2011. I think you just made up this mythical expansion to include other expertise, or you're trusting a cover story someone else invented, because the board's role doesn't seem to have actually expanded. > Board members are national security experts with scientific, military, diplomatic, and political backgrounds Strange that they don't mention trading, or networks, or even finance or technology. But let me give you the benefit of the doubt. If they were looking for his expertise, they must have looked for someone else with that expertise after the scandal. Who did they find instead of him?