3 ms·
The key point here is the deployment model: only change sender, no network or receiver side change. This means if you see even 5% improvement people are going t
by dedalus 10y ago
The key point here is the deployment model: only change sender, no network or receiver side change. This means if you see even 5% improvement people are going to deploy it. Also the key architect seems Neal Cardwell and simply using Van Jacobson as a signoff/vetting authority. Eric Dumazet has long done a lot of work on TCP pacing (look at his prev patches)
Basically all this means is that we have a form of TCP Pacing that can work (but suffers from classic prisoner's dilemma)
- tarrga 10y agoI work at Google in Bandwidth-SRE; watched this as it developed. Van's name is not on this patch as an appeal to authority --- he contributed meaningfully to the design. The analysis to support unloaded vs. loaded probes (to measure time-separated variables) was entirely his.