4 ms·
All depends on the site you find. I usually don't have anything super dark within reasonable range and shoot at 800 most of the time. 3200 is probably pretty gr
by sakopov 10y ago
All depends on the site you find. I usually don't have anything super dark within reasonable range and shoot at 800 most of the time. 3200 is probably pretty grainy, isn't it? I think the highest I've ever gone with my wide-angle lens was 1300 to capture this time-lapse [1] in Colorado with a pretty bleak Milky Way.
[1] https://www.flickr.com/photos/sergeyakopov/11723352663/in/dateposted/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/sergeyakopov/11723352663/in/da...
- maxxxxx 10y ago3200 is grainy, true. But usually it's not too bad. I just don't think with 800 you'll get that many stars and the richness of the Milky Way. If I didn't live in LA I would try ISO 800 tonight and compare with 3200 but I'll have to wait until I get to a dark place again.