> There is nothing to the concept of "knowing what you are talking about" when selecting who to fund and who not IMO. I disagree. For example, clearly the head

> There is nothing to the concept of "knowing what you are talking about" when selecting who to fund and who not IMO. I disagree. For example, clearly the head of the Museum of Modern Art in NY would make better decisions than I would about who to fund, because they know what they are talking about. That knowledge and its application aren't perfect, but they do add necessary value.