3 ms·

Hypothetically, how do you think the market would respond if Apple said that apps could only be sold through the store?

by Teever 10y ago

rblatz 10y ago
Considering that the only app I use on my mac from the AppStore is xCode, I'd say it would respond very negatively.
- coldtea 10y ago
  If you use XCode you are already not the typical consumer.
  - madeofpalk 10y ago
    True, but last time I checked Xcode is one of the most popular apps in the Mac App Store. That says something
madeofpalk 10y ago
With the restrictions it currently imposes (sandboxing), I think we would see a significant withdrawal from the Mac platform. Many developers would stop making apps (especially those that are for power users, which when turn more devs away from macs). I doubt Adobe Creative Suite (Photoshop) would be technically possible with sandboxing, so Adobe would withdraw from Mac. MS Office would probably be gone as well. Parallels and other virtualisation software would find it extreme difficult to run. Valve would have to pull Steam because you can be as sure as hell they aren't going to give Apple a 30% cut of Steam sales. There goes Skype as well. Without special deals with lots of developers, I doubt we would see many more apps on the App Store and instead we'll see the Mac be an unsuitable platform for many/most people. It would turn into a glorified Chromebook.
- pjmlp 10y ago
  Except that all the real desktop alternatives are adopting the same sandbox models. So, just like any technology adoption that comes from above those developers would just shut up and follow along. Or do you think they would earn any money selling to GNU/Linux users?
  - madeofpalk 10y ago
    In this hypothetical situation Microsoft doesnt make the stupid move of requiring all apps go through their store which imposes its own limitations (like sandboxing). Mind you, it would be a completely insane move for Apple (or Microsoft) and I can't see them doing this any time soon. It would be absolute suicide.
    - pjmlp 10y ago
      Except there are no alternatives for those that sell software, as I mentioned on my comment FOSS users don't pay for desktop software.
      - madeofpalk 10y ago
        There's all the ways people sell software on Microsoft platforms. Adobe has managed to get thousands from users without any 'help' from Microsoft.
        pjmlp 10y ago
        How is Adobe going to do it when Windows follows the same footsteps than Mac OS X? The only way will be the store, or why do you think Microsoft is making it easy to port Win32/WPF (legacy) applications to the store model? When the applications that matter like Adobe are on the store, and Apple has proven the "my way or the highway" works, they will slowly disable the "legacy" model. I have been through enough computing changes to believe this will indeed happen.

Hypothetically, how do you think the market would respond if Apple said that apps could only be sold through the store?

by Teever 10y ago

Hypothetically, how do you think the market would respond if Apple said that apps could only be sold through the store?

rblatz 10y ago

Considering that the only app I use on my mac from the AppStore is xCode, I'd say it would respond very negatively.

coldtea 10y ago
If you use XCode you are already not the typical consumer.
- madeofpalk 10y ago
  True, but last time I checked Xcode is one of the most popular apps in the Mac App Store. That says something

madeofpalk 10y ago

With the restrictions it currently imposes (sandboxing), I think we would see a significant withdrawal from the Mac platform. Many developers would stop making apps (especially those that are for power users, which when turn more devs away from macs). I doubt Adobe Creative Suite (Photoshop) would be technically possible with sandboxing, so Adobe would withdraw from Mac. MS Office would probably be gone as well. Parallels and other virtualisation software would find it extreme difficult to run. Valve would have to pull Steam because you can be as sure as hell they aren't going to give Apple a 30% cut of Steam sales. There goes Skype as well. Without special deals with lots of developers, I doubt we would see many more apps on the App Store and instead we'll see the Mac be an unsuitable platform for many/most people. It would turn into a glorified Chromebook.

pjmlp 10y ago
Except that all the real desktop alternatives are adopting the same sandbox models. So, just like any technology adoption that comes from above those developers would just shut up and follow along. Or do you think they would earn any money selling to GNU/Linux users?
- madeofpalk 10y ago
  In this hypothetical situation Microsoft doesnt make the stupid move of requiring all apps go through their store which imposes its own limitations (like sandboxing). Mind you, it would be a completely insane move for Apple (or Microsoft) and I can't see them doing this any time soon. It would be absolute suicide.
  - pjmlp 10y ago
    Except there are no alternatives for those that sell software, as I mentioned on my comment FOSS users don't pay for desktop software.
    - madeofpalk 10y ago
      There's all the ways people sell software on Microsoft platforms. Adobe has managed to get thousands from users without any 'help' from Microsoft.
      - pjmlp 10y ago
        How is Adobe going to do it when Windows follows the same footsteps than Mac OS X? The only way will be the store, or why do you think Microsoft is making it easy to port Win32/WPF (legacy) applications to the store model? When the applications that matter like Adobe are on the store, and Apple has proven the "my way or the highway" works, they will slowly disable the "legacy" model. I have been through enough computing changes to believe this will indeed happen.