4 ms·
The Clinton Foundation is supposed to be a charity but they spend almost nothing on charity - their expenses are 'conferences', trips, meetings - basically Bill
by jomamaxx 10y ago
The Clinton Foundation is supposed to be a charity but they spend almost nothing on charity - their expenses are 'conferences', trips, meetings - basically Bill and Hillary's personal expense account for things they cannot bill to the government or some other sponsor. Also, they can make ads that promote 'narrative' and the 'personal brand' of Hillary.
- tacomonstrous 10y agoCan you provide evidence for these claims?
- leereeves 10y agoAsk Haitians what they think of the Clinton Foundation: > High Hopes for Hillary Clinton, Then Disappointment in Haiti http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/15/us/politics/hillary-clinton-haiti.html http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/15/us/politics/hillary-clinto...
- tacomonstrous 10y agoCan you point to the part of that article that offers any concrete evidence of wrongdoing?
- leereeves 10y ago> Fewer than half the jobs promised at the industrial park, built after 366 farmers were evicted from their lands, have materialized. Many millions of dollars earmarked for relief efforts have yet to be spent [six years later]. Mrs. Clinton’s brother Tony Rodham has turned up in business ventures on the island
- tacomonstrous 10y agoWhich of those appears to be concrete proof of wrongdoing to you? Is there any evidence that her brother benefited from the Foundation's actions? All I see are insinuations.
- leereeves 10y agoMillions of dollars donated for Haiti disaster relief weren't spent on disaster relief. That doesn't seem like wrongdoing to you?
- tacomonstrous 10y agoNot unless it is shown that it was spent on some other expense. Haiti was uniformly difficult for a wide range of charities.